1 00:00:00,790 --> 00:00:07,320 [Music] 2 00:00:11,999 --> 00:00:08,669 [Applause] 3 00:00:14,220 --> 00:00:12,009 I think a core problem for many of us in 4 00:00:17,159 --> 00:00:14,230 origin of life science is figuring out 5 00:00:19,650 --> 00:00:17,169 what were the first entities capable of 6 00:00:21,330 --> 00:00:19,660 displaying key lifelike properties such 7 00:00:23,429 --> 00:00:21,340 as self propagation and adaptive 8 00:00:25,499 --> 00:00:23,439 evolution but are also simple enough 9 00:00:27,540 --> 00:00:25,509 that we can imagine them spontaneously 10 00:00:30,540 --> 00:00:27,550 arising in the absence of a prior 11 00:00:32,130 --> 00:00:30,550 adaptive process so there are many 12 00:00:34,740 --> 00:00:32,140 models out there but the one that we 13 00:00:37,410 --> 00:00:34,750 tend to rally behind is this notion that 14 00:00:40,110 --> 00:00:37,420 the first entities capable of self 15 00:00:42,030 --> 00:00:40,120 propagation were cooperating sets of 16 00:00:44,310 --> 00:00:42,040 chemical species that were spatially 17 00:00:46,950 --> 00:00:44,320 localized on a mineral surface and could 18 00:00:48,899 --> 00:00:46,960 grow laterally otto catalytically using 19 00:00:51,420 --> 00:00:48,909 fluxes of food and energy present in the 20 00:00:54,119 --> 00:00:51,430 environment and in addition to being a 21 00:00:56,549 --> 00:00:54,129 being able to self propagate it turns 22 00:00:58,170 --> 00:00:56,559 out that these slimes as we like to 23 00:01:00,570 --> 00:00:58,180 refer to them for surface limited 24 00:01:03,359 --> 00:01:00,580 metabolisms could also be evolvable if 25 00:01:06,030 --> 00:01:03,369 rare side reactions either alter or 26 00:01:08,490 --> 00:01:06,040 expand the existing catalytic core and 27 00:01:11,039 --> 00:01:08,500 add new reaction modules or cores as 28 00:01:12,840 --> 00:01:11,049 they're referred to and in the context 29 00:01:16,290 --> 00:01:12,850 of a natural environment where we have 30 00:01:18,240 --> 00:01:16,300 mineral surfaces bathed in for example 31 00:01:20,700 --> 00:01:18,250 sea water that's rich in organics and 32 00:01:23,220 --> 00:01:20,710 other compounds building up by various 33 00:01:25,260 --> 00:01:23,230 prebiotic synthesis pathways we imagine 34 00:01:27,210 --> 00:01:25,270 that the burial and continual exposure 35 00:01:29,070 --> 00:01:27,220 of new mineral surface would tend to 36 00:01:30,990 --> 00:01:29,080 enrich for systems that are better at 37 00:01:34,470 --> 00:01:31,000 getting from grain to grain or at least 38 00:01:37,260 --> 00:01:34,480 can self propagate faster so the goal of 39 00:01:39,240 --> 00:01:37,270 our research is to test the slime model 40 00:01:41,010 --> 00:01:39,250 for the origin of life by essentially 41 00:01:43,050 --> 00:01:41,020 recreating that little seascape I just 42 00:01:44,940 --> 00:01:43,060 showed you and asking if we can enrich 43 00:01:46,260 --> 00:01:44,950 for these systems using a protocol that 44 00:01:48,570 --> 00:01:46,270 we've developed called chemical 45 00:01:50,580 --> 00:01:48,580 ecosystem selection and the protocol is 46 00:01:54,000 --> 00:01:50,590 very simple it essentially involves 47 00:01:55,680 --> 00:01:54,010 combining prebiotic soups containing 48 00:01:57,780 --> 00:01:55,690 many dissolved organics and other 49 00:02:00,660 --> 00:01:57,790 compounds in the presence of mineral 50 00:02:02,160 --> 00:02:00,670 grains allowing for putative slimes to 51 00:02:04,110 --> 00:02:02,170 emerge and in this figure I've depicted 52 00:02:05,820 --> 00:02:04,120 several kinds of slimes that maybe 53 00:02:08,190 --> 00:02:05,830 differ in their colonizing abilities 54 00:02:10,800 --> 00:02:08,200 denoted by different colors and at the 55 00:02:13,380 --> 00:02:10,810 end of an incubation period we transfer 56 00:02:15,210 --> 00:02:13,390 a small subset of colonized grains to 57 00:02:17,309 --> 00:02:15,220 new reaction vessels containing fresh 58 00:02:19,830 --> 00:02:17,319 compounds so fresh food and fresh 59 00:02:20,590 --> 00:02:19,840 uncolonized mineral surface and we do 60 00:02:23,320 --> 00:02:20,600 this over many 61 00:02:24,700 --> 00:02:23,330 with the hopes that we would enrich for 62 00:02:26,860 --> 00:02:24,710 systems that are better at getting from 63 00:02:28,570 --> 00:02:26,870 grain to grain now the nice thing about 64 00:02:30,670 --> 00:02:28,580 this framework is that it's chemically 65 00:02:32,170 --> 00:02:30,680 agnostic meaning that you can test many 66 00:02:34,630 --> 00:02:32,180 different scenarios based on your 67 00:02:36,610 --> 00:02:34,640 preference but for the purposes of this 68 00:02:38,260 --> 00:02:36,620 talk I'm going to give you an example of 69 00:02:40,030 --> 00:02:38,270 a recipe we've been using extensively 70 00:02:43,450 --> 00:02:40,040 and have been getting some cool results 71 00:02:45,460 --> 00:02:43,460 with so the soup that we use is what we 72 00:02:46,960 --> 00:02:45,470 call an enriched miliary soup so it's 73 00:02:48,400 --> 00:02:46,970 actually a synthetic soup that we build 74 00:02:50,920 --> 00:02:48,410 that we make using off-the-shelf 75 00:02:53,050 --> 00:02:50,930 reagents and we make a number of 76 00:02:54,760 --> 00:02:53,060 additions to reflect for example what 77 00:02:57,400 --> 00:02:54,770 you might find in an ocean so salts 78 00:02:59,710 --> 00:02:57,410 transition metals and we also add 79 00:03:01,240 --> 00:02:59,720 potential sources of chemical energy and 80 00:03:03,760 --> 00:03:01,250 the one I'm going to highlight here is 81 00:03:05,890 --> 00:03:03,770 ATP but I'm also going to say and 82 00:03:07,450 --> 00:03:05,900 acknowledge that ATP is probably not a 83 00:03:09,460 --> 00:03:07,460 very pretty but eclis plausible 84 00:03:11,980 --> 00:03:09,470 phosphate source but we used it anyway 85 00:03:13,990 --> 00:03:11,990 so I'm going to show you that data as 86 00:03:15,340 --> 00:03:14,000 for the mineral we've tried a few but 87 00:03:17,500 --> 00:03:15,350 the one again I'm going to focus on is 88 00:03:19,780 --> 00:03:17,510 pyrite this iron sulfide mineral which 89 00:03:21,850 --> 00:03:19,790 we grind up into fine powders and then 90 00:03:23,260 --> 00:03:21,860 use in our experiments and we combine it 91 00:03:26,050 --> 00:03:23,270 with our soup in these little reaction 92 00:03:27,790 --> 00:03:26,060 vessels which are sealed serum vials we 93 00:03:30,370 --> 00:03:27,800 flush the headspace with nitrogen and 94 00:03:31,780 --> 00:03:30,380 then we also autoclave them at the end 95 00:03:36,310 --> 00:03:31,790 of each generation just to ensure 96 00:03:39,760 --> 00:03:36,320 sterility so that's the recipe and of 97 00:03:41,680 --> 00:03:39,770 course being able to deploy this this 98 00:03:44,590 --> 00:03:41,690 protocol implies that would be able to 99 00:03:46,360 --> 00:03:44,600 detect slimes if they were to emerge and 100 00:03:48,250 --> 00:03:46,370 the way we do that is by assuming that 101 00:03:50,020 --> 00:03:48,260 if slimes did emerge and change over 102 00:03:52,690 --> 00:03:50,030 time we'd be able to see that reflected 103 00:03:54,160 --> 00:03:52,700 and changes in a sealed reaction vessel 104 00:03:55,630 --> 00:03:54,170 either in the bulk solution or on the 105 00:03:59,590 --> 00:03:55,640 mineral surface so that's what we look 106 00:04:01,510 --> 00:03:59,600 at so here what we have on the y-axis is 107 00:04:03,580 --> 00:04:01,520 the amount of free phosphate we detect 108 00:04:05,350 --> 00:04:03,590 in our in our soup in our solutions at 109 00:04:07,930 --> 00:04:05,360 the end of an incubation period so if 110 00:04:10,120 --> 00:04:07,940 you remember I mentioned we add ATP so 111 00:04:11,620 --> 00:04:10,130 we can use simple colorimetric assays to 112 00:04:12,940 --> 00:04:11,630 measure the amount of free inorganic 113 00:04:14,740 --> 00:04:12,950 phosphate that's released from the 114 00:04:16,840 --> 00:04:14,750 hydrolysis of that ATP molecule and 115 00:04:19,360 --> 00:04:16,850 track how that changes over times as we 116 00:04:22,600 --> 00:04:19,370 keep selecting so what we see on the y 117 00:04:25,480 --> 00:04:22,610 axis are different lineages so the gray 118 00:04:26,800 --> 00:04:25,490 bars are ten independent lineages that 119 00:04:28,750 --> 00:04:26,810 were set up in the same way with the 120 00:04:30,760 --> 00:04:28,760 same ingredients but propagated 121 00:04:33,370 --> 00:04:30,770 independently of each other and that 122 00:04:34,159 --> 00:04:33,380 orange bar is the average of a control 123 00:04:36,469 --> 00:04:34,169 pool that's 124 00:04:38,959 --> 00:04:36,479 using the same reagents at the same time 125 00:04:41,270 --> 00:04:38,969 but only exposed to one history of 126 00:04:43,580 --> 00:04:41,280 transfers and what you can see from this 127 00:04:46,129 --> 00:04:43,590 plot hopefully pretty clearly is that as 128 00:04:47,659 --> 00:04:46,139 a number of generations increases we 129 00:04:50,689 --> 00:04:47,669 have a progressive decline in the amount 130 00:04:52,070 --> 00:04:50,699 of phosphate we detect and so we infer 131 00:04:55,369 --> 00:04:52,080 that to mean pretty simply that a 132 00:04:57,290 --> 00:04:55,379 history of transfer matters and then 133 00:04:59,269 --> 00:04:57,300 another thing that we that we measure is 134 00:05:00,589 --> 00:04:59,279 basically how much light is absorbed by 135 00:05:03,439 --> 00:05:00,599 that bulk solution at the end of a 136 00:05:05,059 --> 00:05:03,449 generation as a proxy for how many light 137 00:05:06,290 --> 00:05:05,069 absorbing compounds including some of 138 00:05:08,659 --> 00:05:06,300 the organics that we have in our 139 00:05:11,779 --> 00:05:08,669 solution remain after such incubations 140 00:05:13,369 --> 00:05:11,789 and what we find is that vials or 141 00:05:15,469 --> 00:05:13,379 reaction vessels that have a long 142 00:05:17,869 --> 00:05:15,479 history of transferring in this case 18 143 00:05:19,939 --> 00:05:17,879 have significantly lower absorbance than 144 00:05:21,830 --> 00:05:19,949 our control set and we and for that to 145 00:05:23,540 --> 00:05:21,840 mean that some of light absorbing 146 00:05:25,820 --> 00:05:23,550 compounds including the organics have 147 00:05:26,149 --> 00:05:25,830 been depleted from the solution in some 148 00:05:28,610 --> 00:05:26,159 way 149 00:05:30,260 --> 00:05:28,620 so this coincident reduction in both the 150 00:05:32,029 --> 00:05:30,270 amount of free phosphate and light 151 00:05:35,140 --> 00:05:32,039 absorbing compounds and organics and our 152 00:05:38,209 --> 00:05:35,150 bulk solution led us to inspect the 153 00:05:40,040 --> 00:05:38,219 surfaces of our pyrite grains to see if 154 00:05:41,390 --> 00:05:40,050 we could observe any systematic 155 00:05:43,670 --> 00:05:41,400 differences and we used electron 156 00:05:45,379 --> 00:05:43,680 microscopy to do this so here's a 157 00:05:47,929 --> 00:05:45,389 representative micrograph of grains 158 00:05:50,540 --> 00:05:47,939 taken from a control vial so again this 159 00:05:53,420 --> 00:05:50,550 was one that only had one transfer in 160 00:05:55,339 --> 00:05:53,430 its history and this is what we see when 161 00:05:57,409 --> 00:05:55,349 we look at experimental grain so this 162 00:05:59,300 --> 00:05:57,419 one had 18 rounds of transfer in its 163 00:06:01,850 --> 00:05:59,310 history and what you can see hopefully 164 00:06:03,230 --> 00:06:01,860 yes you can see them pretty clearly are 165 00:06:05,300 --> 00:06:03,240 these really distinctive fractal 166 00:06:07,399 --> 00:06:05,310 structures now to make a long story 167 00:06:09,439 --> 00:06:07,409 short about what our best guess as to 168 00:06:12,139 --> 00:06:09,449 what these things are is so we don't 169 00:06:14,029 --> 00:06:12,149 actually think these are the putative 170 00:06:16,519 --> 00:06:14,039 slime or the phosphate or organic 171 00:06:18,469 --> 00:06:16,529 consuming structures we think that there 172 00:06:20,480 --> 00:06:18,479 are salt crystals that are fouled with 173 00:06:22,010 --> 00:06:20,490 organics or growing on a layer of 174 00:06:23,899 --> 00:06:22,020 organics that are on the pyrite surface 175 00:06:27,769 --> 00:06:23,909 and that gives them this distinctive 176 00:06:29,600 --> 00:06:27,779 fractal or seaweed dendrite shape so 177 00:06:31,790 --> 00:06:29,610 what these results in mind we decided to 178 00:06:33,170 --> 00:06:31,800 repeat the experiment this time we 179 00:06:34,429 --> 00:06:33,180 carried it out for longer and we also 180 00:06:36,950 --> 00:06:34,439 took measurements at the end of each 181 00:06:38,860 --> 00:06:36,960 generation this time and this was what 182 00:06:40,700 --> 00:06:38,870 we saw in the free orthophosphate 183 00:06:43,249 --> 00:06:40,710 concentration so this time I've pulled 184 00:06:45,980 --> 00:06:43,259 it to reflect the average of our ten 185 00:06:47,390 --> 00:06:45,990 independent experimental lineages and 186 00:06:49,810 --> 00:06:47,400 you can see pretty clearly this 187 00:06:52,220 --> 00:06:49,820 pretty distinctive oscillatory pattern 188 00:06:54,890 --> 00:06:52,230 where we have an initial what we call a 189 00:06:57,800 --> 00:06:54,900 boom phase that is this linear decline 190 00:07:00,470 --> 00:06:57,810 in the amount of free phosphate and then 191 00:07:02,150 --> 00:07:00,480 a sudden reversal in that trend where we 192 00:07:04,490 --> 00:07:02,160 go back to our initial phosphate levels 193 00:07:07,430 --> 00:07:04,500 if not overshooting it a little bit so 194 00:07:10,160 --> 00:07:07,440 we have a few hypotheses to explain this 195 00:07:12,230 --> 00:07:10,170 behavior one is that that initial 196 00:07:14,930 --> 00:07:12,240 decline in free phosphate which is now a 197 00:07:16,130 --> 00:07:14,940 repeatable instance although you'll 198 00:07:17,360 --> 00:07:16,140 notice the timing is a little bit 199 00:07:18,670 --> 00:07:17,370 different this time and we think that 200 00:07:20,840 --> 00:07:18,680 that's because we use slightly different 201 00:07:24,050 --> 00:07:20,850 batches of our enriched miliary soup 202 00:07:25,400 --> 00:07:24,060 that might vary a little bit we think 203 00:07:28,040 --> 00:07:25,410 that that's reflective of the 204 00:07:30,470 --> 00:07:28,050 self-propagating state taking hold and 205 00:07:32,300 --> 00:07:30,480 growing on the mineral surface now the 206 00:07:34,450 --> 00:07:32,310 bust phase can be explained in a number 207 00:07:36,440 --> 00:07:34,460 of ways the one that we like to to 208 00:07:38,870 --> 00:07:36,450 consider is kind of an ecological 209 00:07:41,600 --> 00:07:38,880 perspective where you essentially have 210 00:07:43,280 --> 00:07:41,610 resource depletion this the system gets 211 00:07:45,290 --> 00:07:43,290 to stay where it consumes its resources 212 00:07:46,070 --> 00:07:45,300 and then collapses and the process 213 00:07:48,800 --> 00:07:46,080 starts all over again 214 00:07:51,200 --> 00:07:48,810 I also want to point out that we've 215 00:07:52,820 --> 00:07:51,210 looked at the fractal coverage at 216 00:07:57,350 --> 00:07:52,830 different points here and we have some 217 00:07:58,850 --> 00:07:57,360 qualitative arm wavy estimates of how 218 00:08:01,040 --> 00:07:58,860 they correlate with the phosphate 219 00:08:03,680 --> 00:08:01,050 pattern so turns out that we get the 220 00:08:06,200 --> 00:08:03,690 highest incidence of fractals when the 221 00:08:07,130 --> 00:08:06,210 phosphate it is also at its minimum so 222 00:08:08,870 --> 00:08:07,140 we think that this provides 223 00:08:11,210 --> 00:08:08,880 circumstantial evidence for what we 224 00:08:13,910 --> 00:08:11,220 think these critters are they're not 225 00:08:17,090 --> 00:08:13,920 actually the slimes they are a proxy for 226 00:08:18,980 --> 00:08:17,100 them essentially but one thing I mean is 227 00:08:21,230 --> 00:08:18,990 pretty clear from from this graph alone 228 00:08:23,420 --> 00:08:21,240 is that it seems like we've enriched for 229 00:08:26,360 --> 00:08:23,430 some kind of nonlinear chemical system 230 00:08:28,100 --> 00:08:26,370 which is good news and that I view long 231 00:08:31,100 --> 00:08:28,110 linearity as being a self a prerequisite 232 00:08:34,220 --> 00:08:31,110 for self propagation and evolution so in 233 00:08:36,290 --> 00:08:34,230 that front were good but I want to get 234 00:08:37,910 --> 00:08:36,300 at the source of this non-linearity a 235 00:08:39,950 --> 00:08:37,920 little bit more specifically and so what 236 00:08:41,750 --> 00:08:39,960 we did for that is we actually looked at 237 00:08:44,180 --> 00:08:41,760 what happened intra generationally so 238 00:08:46,370 --> 00:08:44,190 what happens when you set up your Miller 239 00:08:47,990 --> 00:08:46,380 Urey soup with your pyrite you autoclave 240 00:08:49,870 --> 00:08:48,000 it and then you track how these 241 00:08:52,310 --> 00:08:49,880 different proxy traits change over time 242 00:08:54,590 --> 00:08:52,320 and what we saw in the phosphate at 243 00:08:56,510 --> 00:08:54,600 least is this really again pronounced 244 00:08:58,370 --> 00:08:56,520 oscillatory pattern that looks to be 245 00:09:00,530 --> 00:08:58,380 damped 246 00:09:02,300 --> 00:09:00,540 and notably it also looks like there's a 247 00:09:04,130 --> 00:09:02,310 lot of potential for non-linearity even 248 00:09:05,480 --> 00:09:04,140 after our typical transfer period which 249 00:09:06,590 --> 00:09:05,490 is two days I'm know if I mentioned that 250 00:09:09,830 --> 00:09:06,600 yet 251 00:09:11,210 --> 00:09:09,840 we also looked at the total absorbance 252 00:09:13,490 --> 00:09:11,220 and how that changed over our time 253 00:09:15,050 --> 00:09:13,500 course and you can see that it has its 254 00:09:16,910 --> 00:09:15,060 own dynamics it doesn't necessarily 255 00:09:19,870 --> 00:09:16,920 completely overlap with what we see in 256 00:09:22,520 --> 00:09:19,880 the phosphate but it does seem to 257 00:09:23,960 --> 00:09:22,530 indicate what we would expect to see 258 00:09:25,970 --> 00:09:23,970 with the fractals so again this is very 259 00:09:28,100 --> 00:09:25,980 qualitative we don't really have a good 260 00:09:30,110 --> 00:09:28,110 way to quantify the extent of fractal 261 00:09:32,120 --> 00:09:30,120 coverage yet but what it looks like is 262 00:09:34,490 --> 00:09:32,130 that the fractal frequency increases 263 00:09:37,670 --> 00:09:34,500 over the first 72 hours which is 264 00:09:40,130 --> 00:09:37,680 coincident with this trough in the 265 00:09:41,990 --> 00:09:40,140 uv-vis data after which we no longer 266 00:09:43,700 --> 00:09:42,000 observe them and they never seem to come 267 00:09:47,140 --> 00:09:43,710 back as far as we can tell at least over 268 00:09:50,000 --> 00:09:47,150 the period we looked at so is it a slime 269 00:09:51,800 --> 00:09:50,010 well we're not sure yet but I do think 270 00:09:53,330 --> 00:09:51,810 that these results are really 271 00:09:54,920 --> 00:09:53,340 interesting and I think they kind of 272 00:09:56,450 --> 00:09:54,930 give us an idea of what kinds of 273 00:09:59,200 --> 00:09:56,460 chemistry and what kinds of dynamics we 274 00:10:01,100 --> 00:09:59,210 can expect to find using this protocol 275 00:10:02,570 --> 00:10:01,110 but what we would really need to 276 00:10:04,340 --> 00:10:02,580 convince ourselves that this has the 277 00:10:06,350 --> 00:10:04,350 potential to be a slime as we've defined 278 00:10:08,060 --> 00:10:06,360 it is to demonstrate that it can self 279 00:10:10,070 --> 00:10:08,070 propagate and although we think it's 280 00:10:12,470 --> 00:10:10,080 likely that there is a self propagating 281 00:10:14,270 --> 00:10:12,480 a stage we would really need to 282 00:10:15,770 --> 00:10:14,280 demonstrate that the non-linearity is 283 00:10:19,250 --> 00:10:15,780 actually confined to the mineral surface 284 00:10:20,900 --> 00:10:19,260 and that's part of ongoing work that 285 00:10:22,130 --> 00:10:20,910 also includes clarifying the chemistry 286 00:10:23,900 --> 00:10:22,140 of the slime I'm sure you are dying to 287 00:10:25,070 --> 00:10:23,910 know as much as I am what this thing 288 00:10:26,720 --> 00:10:25,080 looks like what it's made up of 289 00:10:29,090 --> 00:10:26,730 chemically and we just have no idea at 290 00:10:31,310 --> 00:10:29,100 this point and we also to that end want 291 00:10:33,290 --> 00:10:31,320 to test complementary conditions and do 292 00:10:35,780 --> 00:10:33,300 things like swap out ATP for a more 293 00:10:38,150 --> 00:10:35,790 realistic source of phosphate and 294 00:10:40,460 --> 00:10:38,160 finally I just want to end and comment 295 00:10:42,710 --> 00:10:40,470 on this question of is it evolvable I 296 00:10:44,390 --> 00:10:42,720 think that's ultimately what we want to 297 00:10:48,500 --> 00:10:44,400 know and what would make us really 298 00:10:49,880 --> 00:10:48,510 excited to find and so we're moving in 299 00:10:51,560 --> 00:10:49,890 that direction right now and we're 300 00:10:53,720 --> 00:10:51,570 basically looking to see if we can find 301 00:10:56,450 --> 00:10:53,730 changes in the rate of propagation over 302 00:10:57,980 --> 00:10:56,460 time in response to our protocol and 303 00:11:00,050 --> 00:10:57,990 that figure down there it's just 304 00:11:01,370 --> 00:11:00,060 hypothetical data just to show you that 305 00:11:04,220 --> 00:11:01,380 we have some notion of what that should 306 00:11:06,680 --> 00:11:04,230 look like even if we have kind of 307 00:11:08,450 --> 00:11:06,690 different modes of evolution and then 308 00:11:10,789 --> 00:11:08,460 finally I think a long-term goal or kind 309 00:11:12,859 --> 00:11:10,799 of idealistic one would be to create 310 00:11:14,359 --> 00:11:12,869 environment specific strains if you will 311 00:11:17,179 --> 00:11:14,369 that are adapted to slightly different 312 00:11:21,579 --> 00:11:17,189 conditions like pH temperature dissolved 313 00:11:23,449 --> 00:11:21,589 oxygen and have them be fitter or more 314 00:11:26,419 --> 00:11:23,459 efficient in their own respective 315 00:11:28,039 --> 00:11:26,429 environments so with that I just like to 316 00:11:29,569 --> 00:11:28,049 quickly acknowledge the long list of 317 00:11:31,309 --> 00:11:29,579 people that makes us possible and I 318 00:11:33,859 --> 00:11:31,319 actually do these experiments so of 319 00:11:36,949 --> 00:11:33,869 course my PI David Bohm our co-author 320 00:11:40,159 --> 00:11:36,959 and collaborator Jim Cleves our funding 321 00:11:41,659 --> 00:11:40,169 sources that come out of the NASA NSF 322 00:11:43,939 --> 00:11:41,669 ideas labs I'd like to thank our 323 00:11:45,829 --> 00:11:43,949 collaborators as part of that of course 324 00:11:47,209 --> 00:11:45,839 our amazing research group and then 325 00:11:48,919 --> 00:11:47,219 finally just a quick shout out to the 326 00:11:51,139 --> 00:11:48,929 artist of some of the illustrations that 327 00:11:52,999 --> 00:11:51,149 you saw in my talk that actually comes 328 00:11:54,679 --> 00:11:53,009 from a comic we co-wrote about how you 329 00:11:56,539 --> 00:11:54,689 can use science to solve seemingly 330 00:12:05,179 --> 00:11:56,549 intractable questions like the origin of 331 00:12:06,619 --> 00:12:05,189 life so thank you very much we have time 332 00:12:08,629 --> 00:12:06,629 for a couple of questions while our next 333 00:12:14,269 --> 00:12:08,639 speaker comes up here Yeah right there 334 00:12:16,069 --> 00:12:14,279 in the center so I'm very curious you 335 00:12:18,829 --> 00:12:16,079 have these fractals that are interacting 336 00:12:22,159 --> 00:12:18,839 with the the pyrite crystal correct and 337 00:12:24,139 --> 00:12:22,169 they go away with this you know during 338 00:12:25,759 --> 00:12:24,149 the cycling but I'm wondering if at the 339 00:12:27,229 --> 00:12:25,769 end of your experiment if you look very 340 00:12:29,329 --> 00:12:27,239 carefully at the pyrite crystals is 341 00:12:30,589 --> 00:12:29,339 there some evidence that that was there 342 00:12:31,879 --> 00:12:30,599 was some interaction that that was there 343 00:12:34,279 --> 00:12:31,889 are they leaving a record of themselves 344 00:12:36,049 --> 00:12:34,289 if you will so the short answer is we're 345 00:12:39,139 --> 00:12:36,059 not sure yet so we're just getting in 346 00:12:40,789 --> 00:12:39,149 the realm of in-depth surface analysis 347 00:12:42,949 --> 00:12:40,799 that's something that's been quite 348 00:12:45,139 --> 00:12:42,959 difficult to do using the grain format 349 00:12:47,839 --> 00:12:45,149 that we're using so we just don't know 350 00:12:50,149 --> 00:12:47,849 so it's possible that because we don't 351 00:12:50,779 --> 00:12:50,159 see them come back that it's not that 352 00:12:52,699 --> 00:12:50,789 they're gone 353 00:12:53,719 --> 00:12:52,709 per se but they might have diffused to 354 00:12:55,099 --> 00:12:53,729 the point where we don't actually see 355 00:12:56,689 --> 00:12:55,109 them kind of localized and these really 356 00:12:58,969 --> 00:12:56,699 cool fractal structures so that's one 357 00:13:02,299 --> 00:12:58,979 possibility but we just simply don't 358 00:13:04,939 --> 00:13:02,309 know at this point what was your control 359 00:13:08,269 --> 00:13:04,949 with with no pyrite or did you show that 360 00:13:10,699 --> 00:13:08,279 so in the selection experiments we have 361 00:13:13,519 --> 00:13:10,709 controls that are set up strategically 362 00:13:16,279 --> 00:13:13,529 alongside the generations we measure out 363 00:13:18,589 --> 00:13:16,289 so that they only have one generation in 364 00:13:20,820 --> 00:13:18,599 their history so we'll compare samples 365 00:13:23,370 --> 00:13:20,830 that have identical conditions except 366 00:13:25,920 --> 00:13:23,380 that will have say 20 generations of 367 00:13:27,960 --> 00:13:25,930 transfers versus just one but you 368 00:13:30,120 --> 00:13:27,970 haven't done it with no pyrite oh we've 369 00:13:32,610 --> 00:13:30,130 done the time series experiments with no 370 00:13:34,320 --> 00:13:32,620 pyrite and convinced ourselves that the 371 00:13:36,390 --> 00:13:34,330 at least the intergenerational dynamics 372 00:13:39,090 --> 00:13:36,400 we see require the presence of pyrite 373 00:13:41,820 --> 00:13:39,100 but we have not yet done selection 374 00:13:44,460 --> 00:13:41,830 experiments in the absence of pyrite and 375 00:13:49,260 --> 00:13:44,470 we plan on doing that alright one more 376 00:13:52,440 --> 00:13:49,270 over here so you saw fun dynamics with 377 00:13:55,680 --> 00:13:52,450 within a single vial but without 378 00:13:57,600 --> 00:13:55,690 transfers right so I was wondering is 379 00:13:59,130 --> 00:13:57,610 there anything do you know if there's 380 00:14:01,590 --> 00:13:59,140 anything different that happens if you 381 00:14:04,320 --> 00:14:01,600 transfer out of that vial at different 382 00:14:07,530 --> 00:14:04,330 time points like does it starve and stop 383 00:14:09,300 --> 00:14:07,540 being able to propagate or does it 384 00:14:11,700 --> 00:14:09,310 propagate differently if you pull it out 385 00:14:14,460 --> 00:14:11,710 at different moments like that might 386 00:14:16,740 --> 00:14:14,470 tell you if it's depending on non 387 00:14:20,820 --> 00:14:16,750 equilibrium chemistry yes that's a great 388 00:14:23,730 --> 00:14:20,830 question the only real data that I have 389 00:14:24,720 --> 00:14:23,740 to that from experiments like the ones 390 00:14:26,070 --> 00:14:24,730 you've just suggested are very 391 00:14:27,540 --> 00:14:26,080 preliminary we did them just once 392 00:14:29,490 --> 00:14:27,550 actually in parallel with the time 393 00:14:31,290 --> 00:14:29,500 course I just showed you and we found 394 00:14:32,910 --> 00:14:31,300 basically did a one-day transfer and a 395 00:14:34,650 --> 00:14:32,920 two-day transfer and we kept those 396 00:14:36,480 --> 00:14:34,660 lineages separately so basically one had 397 00:14:38,670 --> 00:14:36,490 a two-day generation time the other had 398 00:14:41,880 --> 00:14:38,680 a 1-day generation time and we did find 399 00:14:43,950 --> 00:14:41,890 that the boom-bust patterning that you 400 00:14:45,480 --> 00:14:43,960 got in those two or it was quite 401 00:14:46,920 --> 00:14:45,490 different the timing was quite different 402 00:14:50,300 --> 00:14:46,930 which suggests that when you do that 403 00:14:52,260 --> 00:14:50,310 initial transfer where you are in that 404 00:14:54,150 --> 00:14:52,270 oscillation that you get 405 00:14:57,030 --> 00:14:54,160 intergenerationally matters but that's 406 00:14:58,860 --> 00:14:57,040 all very preliminary and we are going to 407 00:15:00,860 --> 00:14:58,870 do experiments much more extensively and 408 00:15:03,990 --> 00:15:00,870 try to use that intergenerational 409 00:15:06,630 --> 00:15:04,000 dynamic pattern to strategically select 410 00:15:07,830 --> 00:15:06,640 different generation times but yeah 411 00:15:09,920 --> 00:15:07,840 that's a great question we're thinking 412 00:15:12,330 --> 00:15:09,930 along those lines very much so okay and 413 00:15:15,870 --> 00:15:12,340 one more quick question in the center a 414 00:15:17,640 --> 00:15:15,880 quick question it seems to me that one 415 00:15:19,380 --> 00:15:17,650 of the sort of important assumptions 416 00:15:22,350 --> 00:15:19,390 that goes into the slime model is you 417 00:15:24,090 --> 00:15:22,360 have a relatively slow chaos for these 418 00:15:25,770 --> 00:15:24,100 like organics on its surfaces and it 419 00:15:26,940 --> 00:15:25,780 seems like that's actually a pretty like 420 00:15:28,560 --> 00:15:26,950 at least compared to what you've done 421 00:15:30,360 --> 00:15:28,570 like a pretty simple experiment you 422 00:15:31,980 --> 00:15:30,370 could do to sort of limit or constrain 423 00:15:32,620 --> 00:15:31,990 what types of species you're interested 424 00:15:36,670 --> 00:15:32,630 in 425 00:15:39,040 --> 00:15:36,680 yeah yes and I am by note I'm not an 426 00:15:42,340 --> 00:15:39,050 expert in nonlinear dynamics so I am not 427 00:15:43,960 --> 00:15:42,350 I don't know what to say it your to your 428 00:15:45,249 --> 00:15:43,970 point about yes have you guys tried to 429 00:15:47,379 --> 00:15:45,259 do in the experiment you take a single 430 00:15:49,720 --> 00:15:47,389 component add it to pyrite and just see 431 00:15:52,030 --> 00:15:49,730 what's how what's the kinetics of it 432 00:15:54,100 --> 00:15:52,040 sticking on to pyrite we have not but we 433 00:15:56,230 --> 00:15:54,110 plan on doing kind of reduction 434 00:15:57,819 --> 00:15:56,240 experiments where we leave out whole 435 00:15:59,439 --> 00:15:57,829 groups of compounds and maybe I don't